Thijmen Loof vs Shunsuke Nakagawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Nov at 04:43 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Loof vs S. Nakagawa

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Loof 1 - 0 Nakagawa
They have played 3 sets in total, with Thijmen Loof winning 2 and Shunsuke Nakagawa winning 1. The last match between Thijmen Loof and Shunsuke Nakagawa was at the Yokohama Challenger, 16-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Thijmen Loof getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loof | 1 |
| Nakagawa | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Yokohama Challenger(11-16-25)
T. Loof vs S. Nakagawa H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 41.61% (62-87) | Career Total W/L | 60.18% (68-45) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Loof vs S. Nakagawa Match Preview:
- Recent form indicates Shunsuke Nakagawa has a higher second serve point win rate at 41.28% compared to Thijmen Loof's 34.78%. Could this give Nakagawa a service advantage?
- In return games, Nakagawa outperforms Loof, winning 45.38% of second serve return points and 29.15% on first serve returns, compared to Loof's 42.11% and 13.89% respectively.
- When under pressure, Loof shows resilience, saving 70.00% of breakpoints, contrasting Nakagawa’s lower rate of 49.38%. Does this mean Loof has a stronger mental game?
- A yearly performance overview reveals Nakagawa’s 64.15% match win rate significantly surpasses Loof’s 11.11% win rate. Could this reflect overall consistency and skill?
- Analyzing surface preferences, Loof’s best surface is Clay with a 44% win rate, whereas Nakagawa excels on Hard courts with the same win percentage.
- In the last year, Loof played mostly in Challengers/ITF $10K+ events with a 16.67% win rate, whereas Nakagawa has a higher 65.96% win record in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events.
- Loof’s opponents have been of slightly higher average ranking (339.11) compared to Nakagawa’s (421.38). Could this suggest Loof faces tougher competition?
- In deciding sets, Nakagawa slightly edges ahead with a 55% win rate versus Loof’s 50% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (November 16, 2025, UTC):
As we delve into the match statistics, it becomes evident that Shunsuke Nakagawa holds several advantages over Thijmen Loof. Nakagawa's prowess in both second serve efficiency and return games provides him with a strong foundation to dominate the court.
While Thijmen Loof showcases exceptional capability in breakpoint saves, his overall match win rate falls significantly short of Nakagawa's track record over the past year. This discrepancy is a critical factor in predicting match outcomes, especially given Nakagawa's higher likelihood of prevailing in tight situations as indicated by his marginally better success in deciding sets.
Moreover, although Loof has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, this aspect may not be sufficient to offset Nakagawa’s experiential advantage and consistent performance at the tournament level they have both participated in.
Taking all these factors into account, Shunsuke Nakagawa is the most likely candidate to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match. His superior aggregate stats and proven track record suggest he has the necessary tools to outperform Thijmen Loof.
Thijmen Loof vs Shunsuke Nakagawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Loof vs S. Nakagawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:0:8 | Average Match Time | 2:0:8 |
| 73% (68/93) | 1st Serve % | 62% (58/94) |
| 69% (47/68) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (37/58) |
| 72% (18/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (19/36) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
| 40% (38/94) | Return Points Win % | 30% (28/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Loof Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | W | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 7-6(5) | ||
Q3 | L | 7-6(6) 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
S. Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||

T. Loof vs S. Nakagawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41.61% (62/87) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.18% (68/45) |
| 44.34% (145/182) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.16% (151/100) |
| 49.14% (1604/1660) | Games Win/Loss | 53.12% (1259/1111) |
| 44.44% (28/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.75% (65/42) |
| 44.00% (33/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 11.11% (1/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 251 | Aces Total | 163 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 160 | Total Double Faults | 116 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 252.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.14 |
| 64% (3041/4778) | 1st Serve % | 67% (3012/4496) |
| 67% (2047/3041) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1904/3012) |
| 47% (812/1737) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (715/1484) |
| 41% (141/343) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (219/497) |
| 35% (1577/4509) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1858/4517) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Challenger W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 43.48% (60/78) | Futures W/L | 63.11% (65/38) |
| 43% (61/142) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (68/112) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 37% (16/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 74% (23/31) |
| 38% (13/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 89% (61/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (69/62) |
| 11% (61/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (69/7) |
| 9% (88/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (44/6) |